Many comments on the above tweet say this was excessive force. Here is James Wood’s comment:
When the police wait as children are executed or sit in their stations because they have no gas for patrol cars, examples like the above video will deter crime and will become more frequent. Do I like this new paradigm? No, but this is what happens in a two-tiered justice system. Ask yourself why the government wants to increase gun control?
David DeGerolamo
THAT is exactly how to respond to an armed attacker!! Bravo!!
That is how it works.
In TX, it’s against the law to fire “warning shots” 😉
When the same (armed & using it) anti-crime enthusiasm is directed at the crime syndicate, that is the (D.C.) Uniparty political class and their ruling elite puppet-masters, I’ll begin to believe that the babbling about “deterring crime” and “the rule of law” is sincere.
I just love it when I’m out shopping and see men with open carry weapons. I am being 100% serious for the record.
It feels like you are shopping in a secure location and for the most part have that security all the way to the car.
Gun control is being able to hit your target spot on, everytime.
Saw this first maybe two years ago.
That does not lessen its dramatic lesson to the Sheeple about concealed carry.
Apparently it is a small post office.
One commenter has indicated that Texas required a warning shot. I find that ridiculous and ask that a citation if the actual law be posted to support that ridiculous statement.
Read the comment again. … it’s against the law to fire “warning shots”
That said, it’s still clearly obvious the “good guy” had a trigger finger that was itching to kill a negro. Yes, there are no absolutes, no guarantees, in a (close range, spitting distance) gun fight. But if I shot someone in the head, at that range…..once, twice, thrice, I’d easily be able to register, after the first, that no follow up shots were necessary. The second and third was the “winner” having fun.
Perfect Response
There will be No Recidivism
Old White guy was totally oblivious. Didn’t have a clue. Probably a democrat.
I can add nothing to the comments below except this small morsal of common sense, which I have posted before:
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them to obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlen
He did give warning! While he fired his warning shot into the head of the first guy, the other two ferals heeded it!
The rule of law is fully in operation, and being enforced (communism). The rule of CONSTITUTIONAL law is what the U.S. is supposed to have. RoCL is of the people, for the people, by the people! On the other hand, there is no we the people component in rol. Example- the U.S. democrat installed, rol government in Afghanistan. Just what we don’t want! Proff read your articles, and quit using fake news democrat buzz phrases! Next thing ya know, you’ll be referring to the U.S. as a democracy!