See additional comments on Tea Party Nation.
TL Davis asks why the Tea Party is not responding to the Constitutional crisis of the Roberts’ Supreme Court decision on healthcare. I initially put an excerpt from the article and a link to his original article (link is at the bottom of this post). I decided to post the article in its entirety for our readers to respond here. His thoughts outline the difference between the Tea Party and the Liberty Movement. The emphasis below was added by me.
David DeGerolamo
Why?
This is the constitutional crisis the Tea Party has been waiting for. If ever there were justification for action instead of debate, the Tea Party has been handed their opportunity. If ever there were a reason to surround the Supreme Court in protest, this is it.
Silence.
Yes, they are working to solve the constitutional crisis politically, but it can’t be done politically. One might repeal Obamacare all they want, it does not change the ruling that throws open the doors to government control over one’s life, over their health and over their death. The ruling cannot be repealed, it must be repudiated, Chief Justice Roberts must be impeached for abuse of power and/or treason and a new court must hear the arguments all over again. (Yes, I know Obama would insert a liberal justice, does it really matter?)
Logically, none of this can be done politically; not by electing certain members of congress, or by putting in power Republicans who have allowed all of the abuses of the Obama Administration without a single cry of protest.