Autopen Pardons

Posted in Editorial | 13 Comments

Col. Doug Macgregor: Mexican Cartels’ Advanced Weaponry, and Why They’re a Bigger Threat Than Russia

Posted in Editorial | 10 Comments

An Autopen Signature Should Not Be Valid

This is easy. Someone was signing legislation, pardons and executive orders with an autopen since Joe Biden was mentally incompetent. The DOJ needs to file a suit reversing anything signed by the faux Biden.

From Grok:

If legislation, pardons, or executive orders signed by an autopen instead of Joe Biden were declared null and void, the consequences would depend on legal, political, and practical factors. Here’s a breakdown of what could happen:

Legal Consequences

  1. Invalidation of Actions: If a court ruled that autopen signatures lack the president’s direct intent or awareness—key for constitutional acts like signing bills, issuing pardons, or enacting executive orders—those actions could be deemed unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 7) requires the president to sign bills into law, implying personal involvement. An autopen, if unauthorized or used without Biden’s knowledge, might not meet this standard, voiding affected laws.
    • For example, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act or the $40 billion Ukraine aid package, if signed by autopen without clear authorization, could be challenged.
  2. Pardons Reversed: Biden’s pardons—like those for Hunter Biden, Anthony Fauci, or Mark Milley on January 19, 2025—could be nullified. This might reopen legal cases against recipients, though proving autopen use alone wouldn’t automatically undo them; courts would need evidence Biden didn’t authorize it. Precedents like Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon (pre-autopen era) show pardons are rarely overturned, but this could set a new legal test.
  3. Executive Orders Undone: Orders like the pause on liquefied natural gas exports or immigration policies could be struck down. Agencies would lose authority to enforce them, potentially halting regulations midstream.

Political Consequences

  1. Chaos in Governance: Voiding major legislation or orders from 2021–2025 could paralyze parts of the federal government. Agencies relying on those laws—like the EPA or DHS—might face immediate legal uncertainty, disrupting everything from environmental rules to border security.
  2. Partisan Firestorm: Republicans could exploit this to delegitimize Biden’s presidency, pushing to unravel his legacy. Democrats might counter that autopen use is routine (e.g., Obama signed a 2011 bill with it), accusing opponents of political overreach. Missouri AG Andrew Bailey’s call for a DOJ probe into Biden’s cognitive decline reflects this tension already brewing by March 2025.
  3. Congressional Backlash: Congress might rush to re-pass voided laws under Trump, though with a potentially different political makeup post-2024, outcomes could shift. Alternatively, gridlock could stall fixes.

Practical Consequences

  1. Economic Disruption: If funding bills (e.g., the 2022 omnibus) were voided, billions in allocated funds—say, for infrastructure or Ukraine—could be frozen, spiking uncertainty in markets and international relations. LNG export pauses being reversed might boost energy markets but anger environmentalists.
  2. Legal Limbo: Courts would face a flood of challenges. For instance, if Hunter Biden’s pardon was nullified, prosecutors could revive cases, but statutes of limitations or double jeopardy might complicate retries. The Supreme Court might ultimately decide, possibly years later.
  3. Precedent for Future: A ruling against autopen signatures could ban their use, forcing presidents to sign everything by hand—a logistical nightmare given modern government’s pace. Alternatively, Congress might clarify autopen legality to prevent future crises.

Caveats

  • Historical Use: Autopens aren’t new—Thomas Jefferson used a precursor, and Obama set the modern precedent for legislation. Courts might uphold them if Biden authorized their use, as no law explicitly bans it.
  • Burden of Proof: Challengers would need to prove Biden didn’t know or approve, which is tough without internal White House records. The Oversight Project’s March 2025 claims about widespread autopen use lack definitive evidence tying it to unawareness.
  • Timing: As of March 16, 2025, no court has ruled on this. Speculation about nullification stems from groups like Heritage’s Oversight Project and figures like Bailey, but it’s not yet law.

Likely Outcome

Mass nullification is improbable without ironclad evidence of fraud or incapacity—think 25th Amendment-level proof, not just autopen use. Courts lean toward preserving stability; they’d likely uphold actions if Biden’s intent was documented. Short-term chaos might hit specific pardons or orders, but wholesale reversal of four years’ work would be a legal and political earthquake, restrained by practical limits. Still, even a partial ruling could reshape trust in executive power for decades.

Posted in Editorial | 10 Comments

Boots on the ground and news you should know…MAJOR inflation just hit me hard on this item I need.

Posted in Editorial | Comments Off on Boots on the ground and news you should know…MAJOR inflation just hit me hard on this item I need.

It’s about the Money

Posted in Editorial | 16 Comments

El Salvador: US Prison Annex

Posted in Editorial | 12 Comments

Multiply This by Hundreds of Agencies

Posted in Editorial | 6 Comments

We Want to Believe

UPDATE: Good job. This legislation is pending but hasn’t been passed. I was surprised by some large accounts who fell for this.

Posted in Editorial | 15 Comments

A Good Analysis

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

SpaceX Success – Biden Failure

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Department of Education

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

SpaceX Investigations

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

Biden’s Blackmail Bribe

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

The First of Many

Posted in Editorial | 6 Comments

Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of The United States by Tren De Aragua

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

Tren de Aragua (TdA) is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization with thousands of members, many of whom have unlawfully infiltrated the United States and are conducting irregular warfare and undertaking hostile actions against the United States. TdA operates in conjunction with Cártel de los Soles, the Nicolas Maduro regime-sponsored, narco-terrorism enterprise based in Venezuela, and commits brutal crimes, including murders, kidnappings, extortions, and human, drug, and weapons trafficking. TdA has engaged in and continues to engage in mass illegal migration to the United States to further its objectives of harming United States citizens, undermining public safety, and supporting the Maduro regime’s goal of destabilizing democratic nations in the Americas, including the United States.

TdA is closely aligned with, and indeed has infiltrated, the Maduro regime, including its military and law enforcement apparatus. TdA grew significantly while Tareck El Aissami served as governor of Aragua between 2012 and 2017. In 2017, El Aissami was appointed as Vice President of Venezuela. Soon thereafter, the United States Department of the Treasury designated El Aissami as a Specially Designated Narcotics Trafficker under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, 21 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. El Aissami is currently a United States fugitive facing charges arising from his violations of United States sanctions triggered by his Department of the Treasury designation.

Like El Aissami, Nicolas Maduro, who claims to act as Venezuela’s President and asserts control over the security forces and other authorities in Venezuela, also maintains close ties to regime-sponsored narco-terrorists. Maduro leads the regime-sponsored enterprise Cártel de los Soles, which coordinates with and relies on TdA and other organizations to carry out its objective of using illegal narcotics as a weapon to “flood” the United States. In 2020, Maduro and other regime members were charged with narcoterrorism and other crimes in connection with this plot against America.

Over the years, Venezuelan national and local authorities have ceded ever-greater control over their territories to transnational criminal organizations, including TdA. The result is a hybrid criminal state that is perpetrating an invasion of and predatory incursion into the United States, and which poses a substantial danger to the United States. Indeed, in December 2024, INTERPOL Washington confirmed: “Tren de Aragua has emerged as a significant threat to the United States as it infiltrates migration flows from Venezuela.” Evidence irrefutably demonstrates that TdA has invaded the United States and continues to invade, attempt to invade, and threaten to invade the country; perpetrated irregular warfare within the country; and used drug trafficking as a weapon against our citizens.

Based upon a review of TdA’s activities, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, on February 20, 2025, acting pursuant to the authority in 8 U.S.C. 1189, the Secretary of State designated TdA as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

More…

Posted in Editorial | 22 Comments