The FDA has now endorsed treating COVID with Ivermectin!
— skymeds store | Online Ivermectin Pharmacy (@skymeds_store) April 22, 2025
How many people died because they were not allowed to use this or even talk about it? pic.twitter.com/EVDtEdbc4b
~~~~~~~~~~~
I took ivermectin for prophylaxis. No vaxx for us. Grok loves the FDA and WHO.
From Grok:
The X post’s claim of FDA endorsement appears unsubstantiated. A reply from
@Tall216
(Post: 1914707580548735342) directly questions this, noting they couldn’t find confirmation and citing the FDA’s unchanged stance. This skepticism aligns with the official data: there’s no record of the FDA reversing its position by April 2025. The Fox News screenshot in the post, with a caption about the FDA “now saying” something, lacks context and a direct quote, making it unreliable without a primary source. Misinformation around Ivermectin has been rampant, often fueled by distrust in institutions, as seen in replies like @swamphunt3’s mention of Trump’s 2025 WHO withdrawal (Post: 1914692651473101099), which Johns Hopkins notes could weaken global health coordination.
This eliminates the ‘no other alternative’ clause of the emergency authorization on the not-a-vaxxx.
Short phizer, short biontech, short moderna….
No one will be charged, cause the epic Blue Cross and Blue Shield will be open to the $$$$ involvement to give the jab.
Where did you get it? Its about to be legal over the counter but i would like to go ahead and stock up
Farm supply store
That’s where I got mine, too. The difference between the pharmacy ivermectin and the horse ivermectin is that the pharma stuff is 4% and the horse stuff is 1.75%, which gives you a little breathing room if your calculations are off.
Either murder or crimes against humanity. Either one works…but there MUST be justice.
We did the same thing. No vaxx, never got Covid. The link to the article discussing sources and dosages has been at the top of the page for years: https://www.barnhardt.biz/ivermectin/
Nuremberg for the doctors that profited from pushing the vaxx, the researchers that developed it, the politicians that supported the depopulation plan and blocked the access to ivermectin, and a complete economic ban of Chinese-made products until the CCP falls.
Anything less and they will simply try something else until they succeed and we’re dead.
Grok may be useful for some things, but one has to always remember it bears the biases of its programmers. Got woke programmers? You’ll get a woke AI.
They don’t want to repeat the same mistake they made with Tay and allow a free-thinking AI.
Correct. I have questioned Grok multiple times concerning his answer and it has changed its answer based on new input from me.
Yep. The same is true for offline Large Languare Models (Llama, DeepSeek, Hermes). It’s interesting to watch the “reasoning” of Deepseek in real time… it will work on the question, reevaluate it’s thinking, adds other factors, and then provide the answer. If you challenge it, sometimes it will reconsider it’s answer and modify it. Still searching for a truly non-woke LLM.
EDIT: Didn’t know this, but evidently GROK is available as an offline model that can run on LM Studio. Downloading it now for testing.