On the data side, more and more evidence mounts that not only does HCQ make a positive difference in lessening the impact of covid-19 (when delivered early along with zinc and an antibiotic like azithromycin), but it also appears to work effectively when taken in advance of infection as a preventative measure.
On the headline side, it’s “dangerous”, it will “KILL you”, it has concerning side effects, and it’s akin to taking “camel urine” (seriously…that’s a recent headline) The Keystone Kops-esque WHO just recently came out with a warning, despite having the previously-published stance for years: “Despite hundreds of millions of doses administered in the treatment of malaria, there have been no reports of sudden unexplained death”.
And so the battle for truth on the airwaves and internets rages on. Which is extremely sad, as there remain important developments we need accurate actionable information on. For example, China’s researchers are reporting that covid-19 is mutating fast there, with different strains producing differing pathologies.
How can we expect to mount effective responses against new developments like these when there’s such disagreement on basic facts these days?
A grand jury has issued a true bill of criminal charges against Cherokee County’s former DSS director, the agency’s attorney, and its Child Protective Services Unit Supervisor.
Former Cherokee County DSS Cynthia Palmer has been indicted on two counts of felony obstruction of justice, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and willful failure to discharge duties and perjury.
Attorney Ronald Scott Lindsay has been indicted on 20 counts of felony obstruction of justice, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and willful failure to discharge duties.
David Alan Hughes is charged with 10 counts of obstruction of justice, one count of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and willful failure to discharge duties.
We have a very important election coming up for North Carolina 11th District Congressional seat. You may want to ask yourself some questions. What ever happened to Haywood County’s 912 group? Why did you never receive emails from the 912 group? Why were you never aware of the things going on in the county at that time?
I can tell you why. Lynda Bennett, running for congress, replacing Mark Meadows, had control of the email list for the 912 group in Haywood County. We know for a fact that you did not receive an email when MoveOn.org and the radical Democratic Socialists came to Haywood County. We asked her to send an email to the list of the 912 group and ask them to meet at the Democratic Headquarters where they were having a meeting. Lynda’s comment to us was “No, There might be a propensity for violence.”
If she can’t make a stand for Haywood County then what makes you think she would be a strong advocate for the United States? What makes you think that she could or would stand up to China, Russia, Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer?
As for those of us who were the 912 group leaders, we will be voting for Madison Cawthorne. We hope you will too!
ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO, in Jacobson v Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court upheld the Cambridge, Mass, Board of Health’s authority to require vaccination against smallpox during a smallpox epidemic. Jacobson was one of the few Supreme Court cases before 1960 in which a citizen challenged the state’s authority to impose mandatory restrictions on personal liberty for public health purposes. What might such a case teach us today? First, it raises timeless questions about the power of state government to take specific action to protect the public’s health and the Constitution’s protection of personal liberty. What limits state power? What does constitutionally protected liberty include? Second, answers to these questions can change as scientific knowledge, social institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence progress. A comparison of answers to these questions 100 years ago and today shows how public health and constitutional law have evolved to better protect both health and human rights.
Jacobson was decided in 1905, when infectious diseases were the leading cause of death and public health programs were organized primarily at the state and community levels. The federal government had comparatively little involvement in health matters, other than preventing ships from bringing diseases such as yellow fever into the nation’s ports. Few weapons existed to combat epidemics. There was no Food and Drug Administration (FDA), no regulation of research, and no doctrine of informed consent. The Flexner Report was 5 years in the future, medicine would have little to offer until sulfonamides were developed in the 1930s, and most vaccines would not be available for almost half a century. Hospitals were only beginning to take their modern form, and people who had mental illnesses were often shut away in asylums.
An interesting dilemma concerning state mandated vaccinations to prevent COVID-19. If you refuse a vaccine, the STATE may physically make you comply. I doubt the synopsis above that settled this case law based on a polio epidemic would have envisioned a time where profits are more important than “curing” a disease.
Could you imagine arguing this case in 1905? Would the court understand that the epidemic in this country was part of a worldwide pandemic caused by the release of a genetically engineered virus? Would they consider that the US government helped sponsor the research that created the virus? How would the court take into consideration that medicine today is more about enslaving the people with high medical insurance run by the government than curing disease? How would they consider the consequences of a protein based vaccine that has side effects with a 30% CFR if the virus mutates?
OR do you really think the courts care about the people in a two-tiered justice system?
“You have no Constitutional right to endanger the public and spread the disease,” according to Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, who was part of President Trump’s impeachment defense team. Dershowitz tells Jason Goodman on Crowdsource the Truth that the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to protect the public health, citing a 1905 Supreme Court decision, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, allowing authorities to take you to a doctor’s office and “plunge a needle into your arm.”
Phil’s had enough, and he has an idea to end the shutdowns. You have a God-given right to live, be free, and pursue happiness, even in a pandemic. Warning: This video may inspire you to yell “FREEEEEDOM!”
Why is hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), one of the most prescribed drugs in history, now suddenly labelled as a lethal threat? And yet barely-tested compounds, like Moderna’s “vaccine”, are quickly and loudly championed?
It’s getting harder and harder to see the inconsistency/hypocrisy as anything but a highly political show in which science is losing out to money. Perhaps nothing makes this point more than Moderna and its blockbuster announcement yesterday that its “vaccine” generated sufficient antibodies to give recipients immunity to covid-19.
The stock soared as a result…and then the company immediately announced a new funding round. And now today, suddenly experts are saying Moderna hasn’t provided data critical to verifying its claims.
Wait… could yesterday’s “news” have been a pump-and-dump con? And then we find out that the White House’s new “vaccine czar”, Dr Moncef Slaoui, who sat on Moderna’s board up until just a few days ago, is dumping his 156,000 stock options in the company.
Is Moderna being touted because it truly shows more promise than cheap widely-available HCQ? Or because those running the show stand to profit from it? We don’t know for sure, but it sure stinks like it’s the latter.
Jay Powell, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, has overseen more than $2.6 trillion in new liquidity being flooded into the system. And on 60 Minutes last night, he told the nation he’s standing ready with the Fed’s ability to print ‘infinite dollars’ should more rescue be needed.
Everytime a dollar is printed, we lose what little freedom we have left. It is this simple: as the Fed prints infinite dollars, they depreciate your assets and increase the national debt to enslave us, our children and our grandchildren.
I laughed. Honestly would you expect anything different?
So I forwarded it on to a few friends. One of the interesting responses I got back was this, “I think we’ve been played for years. Amazing watching people believe this time will be different. Trump is the best actor ever. He has surrounded himself with the opposition and expects us to believe he’s on our side. Sadly most people still believe. Trump is good I’ll have to admit. Poor Trump just can’t drain the swamp, it’s just too hard. Tsk Tsk!”
Today, the “law” is a weapon wielded by the establishment to cement its grip on its power and position. None of us wanted to face the world we thought was coming in the future; now that future is here. There is no Rule of Law in this once great country. If any ordinary citizen had done the things the previous administration has done, they would be rotting in a jail cell for the rest of their lives.
It is really simple. We have no rule of law in the United States. Without the rule of law, there is no Republic. If there is no Republic, we have to examine other options that do not include the tyrant’s abuses under their “rule of law”. I see no other option than a balkanization into smaller regions based on heritage, economics and morality.
For all those out there who have been following Q and saying trust the plan, well I feel sorry for you. For all those out there who keep saying that Trump will put these criminals in prison, well I feel sorry for you. It’s been four years now and NOTHING!
These criminals continue to walk free and laugh at us. We are more than justified in the initiation of violence to bring justice to these criminals. Yes it will take violence. Do you think they are just going to freely turn themselves in for some common man justice?
There are so many problems facing us right now, the virus, our debt, our coming elections, unemployment, food shortages, the economy, the list goes on. But this, the utter destruction of the Rule of Law that has plagued us for some time, to me, is sickening and the most dangerous threat.
The Declaration of Independence states that “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government.”
They don’t realize that by rejecting the Rule of Law, they have set us free. We are independent. We owe them nothing, not respect, not loyalty, not obedience. We Owe Them Nothing!!!
Tyranny will soon force good men to fulfill a dangerous oath.
