This essay copied from MISES.ORG
What Would Murray Say About the Coronavirus?
Murray
Rothbard died in January 1995, long before this year’s coronavirus
scare. But the principles this great thinker taught us can help us
answer questions about the coronavirus outbreak which trouble many of
us. Would the US government be justified in imposing massive involuntary
quarantines in order to slow down the spread of disease? What about
vaccines? If government scientists claim that they have discovered a
vaccine for the coronavirus, should we take it? If we refuse, can the
government force us to do so? These are the sort of problems we can
solve if we look to Murray for help.
The fundamental rule for deciding whether anyone, including the
government, is justified in using force to make us do something we don’t
want to do is the nonaggression principle (NAP). As Murray put in in
“War, Peace, and the State,” “No one may threaten or commit violence
(‘aggress’) against another man’s person or property. Violence may be
employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only
defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no
violence may be employed against a nonaggressor.”
You might at first think that you can use the NAP to justify forced
quarantines against the coronavirus. Suppose someone had a deadly
disease that would always spread to others if he came in contact with
them. Probably the person would want to isolate himself and not infect
others, but if he refused, wouldn’t the people in danger be justified in
isolating him? He is a threat to others, even if he doesn’t intend to
harm them.
Thinking about this case can lead us astray, and here is where Murray can help us most. In his great book The Ethics of Liberty,
he says, “It is important to insist, however, that the threat of
aggression be palpable, immediate, and direct, in short, that it be
embodied in the initiation of an overt act. Any remote or indirect
criterion—any ‘risk’ or ‘threat’—is simply an excuse for invasive action
by the supposed ‘defender’ against the alleged ‘threat.’” Murray
hammers home the point later in the book. He says, “Once one can use
force against someone because of his ‘risky’ activities, the sky is the
limit, and there is virtually no limit to aggression against the rights
of others. Once permit someone’s ‘fear’ of the ‘risky’ activities of
others to lead to coercive action, then any tyranny becomes justified.”
When we apply what Murray says to the coronavirus situation, we can
answer our question about forced quarantines. People are not threatening
others with immediate death by contagion. Rather, if you have the
disease, you might pass it on to others. Or you might not. What happens
if someone gets the disease is also uncertain.
The key fact about the disease is that we know very little about it.
We talk about the “coronavirus,” but we don’t know that the disease is
caused by a virus. In fact, there is a lot of evidence that it isn’t.
Bill Sardi interviewed a renowned expert on infectious diseases, Dr.
Lawrence Bronxmeyer. Dr. Bronxmeyer pointed out that “Antibiotics cannot
be used for viruses. If a virus, then why aren’t antiviral drugs
working but antibiotics are?”
Further, the disease, fortunately, is not the great danger that it is
being played up to be. “Fear of the COVID-19 coronavirus may be
misplaced. More people are killed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1.7
million) in a year than the few who have been infected (~80,000) or have
died (less than 2000) of the COVID-19 coronavirus.
It is projected that the COVID-19 coronavirus will peak worldwide in
March and then return in a second but lesser peak in September, in
accordance with Yang’s Wuhan study from 2004 to 2013 describing the
annual TB surges in Wuhan, China.
Saying the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus is inevitable, a CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) official advised Americans to “brace themselves” and prepare to shut down public schools, avoid going to church, and self-quarantine their families. These onerous measures are for a virus that has infected just fifty-three Americans (as of February 25), “mostly people who traveled recently to China.”
Murray would agree with Sardi, who says about quarantining Americans,
The coronavirus infects and then produces symptoms 3–5 days later (the incubation period). However, maybe a 2-week quarantine period is not long enough. A recent study says the maximum incubation period is 24 days. That is a long time to quarantine human populations.
These draconian quarantine measures are an overkill. The COVID-19
coronavirus, as it is now called, is infecting and killing no more
people than what occurs in a common cold/flu season (2.5% death rate
among infected individuals). For comparison, the 2017 flu season in the U.S. caused a reported 2 deaths per 100,000.
Why has a panic developed over this disease? Here we can again learn
from Murray. He taught us to follow the money, and in this case, drug
manufacturers and developers of vaccines stand to profit if they can
frighten enough people. We all remember the “swine flu” panic of several
years ago. Doctors developed a vaccine to prevent people from getting
the alleged disease, and this vaccine killed many people. When Gerald
Ford was president, there was also a “swine flu” panic, and you can
watch Murray laughing at the panic here.
If he were with us today, he would be laughing at the fearmongers,
warning us about the dangers of vaccines, drugs, and quarantines, and
reminding us that the main danger we face is the tyrannical and
predatory state.
Author:
Contact Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., is founder and chairman of the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, and editor of LewRockwell.com.