


Our success as a country is due to multiple factors:
You may be thinking that the people responsible for these changes outlined above are ruling members of the Democratic Party. And you would have good cause for this rational based on the pending illegal impeachment of the President. But that is a fallacy. The members of the “Deep State” are responsible for these actions. A term that most people cannot agree on what or who comprises this faction. Let’s start by considering what their goals are:
a. Destroy the economy of the United States from within using domestic enemies. You can see why the Deep State must destroy Donald Trump. Replacing Capitalism with Socialism/Communism is their end game. When the economy is destroyed, they will “save” us by completely enslaving us. At least the lucky ones whom they deem worthy of serving them; the rest will be just casualties of genocide.
b. Destroy the culture of the United States by rewriting history, political correctness, racism and religious attacks on Christianity. Destroying our culture weakens our edification. Our founding fathers recognized this and warned us of its consequences. Loss of moral men through the elimination of everything that we hold dear is their end game.
c. Reduce the world’s population to 500 million people. A nice round number that they will accomplish with World War III as their means to this goal. But more importantly, we see that this is a globalist end game. An internal civil war in the United States is an acceptable alternative if they feel they will win. I believe it is more likely that this civil war may be their worst nightmare: if we win, they lose everything. Have you considered that an American Civil War may save the world?
So should we broaden our nebulous definition of the Deep State? It was pointed out this week that Donald Trump is the first President since Bush the Elder not to have started a war. While I could argue that this policy has a longer time frame, it would seem that Trump may be trying to break the “endless war” policy of the Deep State. You can see why the Deep State must destroy Donald Trump. I will not outline the reasons the globalists want endless wars: the world is seeing already its consequences.
I believe the players in which most of the country considers to be the Deep State are minor functionaries that are disposable to its real leaders. The loss of Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Biden or any of the other “Democrat Presidential Candidates” would not impact the goal of destroying the country or remaking the world in their image. I also believe that Glenn Beck will continue to expose this world threat when he outlines the Open Society 2.0 operations around the world to overthrow world governments as was done in Ukraine and is being done with Antifa in the United States.
I want to leave with two questions: how much of an impediment is Donald Trump to their plans? How will they eliminate him?
David DeGerolamo

Two plus two equals four. Epstein didn’t kill himself.
At the end of 1984, Slavery is Freedom, two plus two equals five, and Winston Smith loves Big Brother. The Party has destroyed Smith’s mind, he embraces whatever narratives it promulgates. The fictive Party has solved the conundrum that bedevils any individual or organization seeking to exercise power: coercion can exact physical compliance and the desired verbalizations, but how do you compel the subjugated to think and believe as you want them to think and believe?
Our Party, the confederation of powerful people who promulgate the narratives that always point the same direction—more government and power for the powerful, less freedom for the subjugated—has yet to reach the mind control of Orwell’s Party, but not for want of desire or effort. We know the Party’s narratives: globalism, climate change, surveillance, incarceration, political correctness, open borders, free migration, fiat debt, central economic planning, socialized education and medical care, and wars on terrorism, drugs, poverty, any regime that refuses to toe the Party line, hydrocarbons, private firearms, individual rights, privacy, precious metals and cash, and socialized education and medical care. We know the Party’s institutions: governments, central banks and their central banks, intelligence agencies, military forces, police, permanent bureaucracies, multinational corporations, multilateral economic, political, and financial institutions, foundations, universities, nonprofits, and NGOs. We know the Party’s overlapping mouthpieces: the mainstream media, think tanks, government and intelligence agency propaganda organs, crony executives and their companies, Hollywood, and academia. And we know the figureheads who stock governments and their allied institutions, and the Party puppeteers who pull their strings.
These include proposals to:
Why would Pamela Karlan be considered as a Supreme Court nominee under a Hillary Clinton administration let alone testify in Congress concerning her definition of impeachment? The simple answer: the Deep State will only put people into positions of power whose goals are to destroy the country by remaking it into their own image. That image includes the ideology of reducing the population of the world to 500,000,000.
David DeGerolamo
Guy will probably be fired but that is amazing.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/05/opinions/trump-is-still-winning-jennings/index.html
When the global elite are aligned against him and laughing like the immature cool kids you hated in middle school, President Donald Trump is winning.
When the politicians are mad — so mad that they have shut down all policymaking to impeach the President of the United States on what constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley called “wafer thin” evidence —Trump is winning.
When the liberal law professors are neglecting their Thanksgiving turkeys to read congressional transcripts and snarking about Trump’s 13-year old son, Trump is winning.
You have to remember: Donald Trump wasn’t elected to fit in with these people — the political, intellectual class — to make them happy, or to become one of them. He was elected to break them. And that’s apparently what he’s done.After Wednesday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring three liberal law professors and Thursday’s announcement by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that her conference is moving forward with impeachment, the die is cast — Donald Trump will be the third president in American history to be impeached by the House of Representatives.
And honestly, that’s just fine with Trump’s supporters. What better evidence is there that you’ve shaken Washington to its core when the minders of a system you’ve come to despise are leveling the gravest punishment the system permits against the very President who is doing the shaking up?We can lawyer this to death, but for many Americans this comes down to a simple observation — Trump said he was going to rattle their cages, and by golly they seem rattled.
Trump’s supporters have known since election night that this day would eventually come. After all, his sworn enemies have been openly promising it since before he was sworn into office! They’ve used words like “resistance,” “,” “insurance policy,” and “impeachment” so often that, now that they are actually doing it, the American people — and Republicans especially — are offering a collective yawn.Rueful analysts stare into television cameras, lamenting and wondering why Republicans aren’t fleeing from the President over the impeachment hearings (he stands at 90% approval among his party in the latest Gallup poll). But there won’t be massive convulsions in public opinion because everyone has known for three years what was going to happen.
Sure, some Democrats gamely argue that Pelosi didn’t really want to go through with it, but she had to out of a sense of duty to the Constitution. But it’s a half-hearted argument at best. It’s true that Pelosi had no choice, although it’s not because of the Constitution. Rather, her party’s left flank and their inflamed grassroots activists overwhelmed her.This is a one-sided, partisan impeachment. It’s the exact kind of thing Congressman Jerry Nadler, now chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, warned Republicans about in 1998, during Bill Clinton’s impeachment. But political party leaders almost always do what the bulk of their party’s supporters want them to. Republicans — no matter how moderate — got in line to cut taxes and confirm an avalanche of conservative judges because that’s what their activists expected.
And what have Democrats wanted more than anything since Trump’s election? Since the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh? Since Trump made Twitter his private channel to the electorate? Since the Mueller probe? Since the Trump Hotel story? Since questions over Jared Kushner’s security clearance? Since…you name it?
The answer is obvious: to undo the 2016 election by any means necessary. It’s a political itch that had to be scratched, and Pelosi could hold off her tormented partisans no longer. So, here we are, headed for a rushed, hyper-partisan (and futile) exercise put on by the very elites Trump railed against to get himself elected in the first place. But for all the relief they might feel in finally striking this blow against Donald Trump, I wonder: have these Trump opponents even considered what this impeachment signals to the American people?That partisanship is more important than policymaking? That House Democrats have no confidence in their party’s ability to beat Donald Trump in an election?And, perhaps most alarmingly, that impeachment — once reserved for the gravest of situations — is now just another tool to inflict damage on their political opponents.

Loyalist, also called Tory, colonist loyal to Great Britain during the American Revolution. Loyalists constituted about one-third of the population of the American colonies during that conflict. They were not confined to any particular group or class, but their numbers were strongest among the following groups: officeholders and others who served the British crown and had a vested interest in upholding its authority; Anglican clergymen and their parishioners in the North, who had likewise taken vows of allegiance and obedience to the king; Quakers, members of German religious sects, and other conscientious pacifists; and large landholders, especially in the North, and wealthy merchant groups in the cities whose businesses and property were affected by the war. The most common trait among all loyalists was an innate conservatism coupled with a deep devotion to the mother country and the crown. Many loyalists at first urged moderation in the struggle for colonial rights and were only driven into active loyalism by radical fellow colonists who denounced as Tories all who would not join them. Loyalists were most numerous in the South, New York, and Pennsylvania, but they did not constitute a majority in any colony. New York was their stronghold and had more than any other colony. New England had fewer loyalists than any other section.
The loyalists did not rise as a body to support the British army, but individuals did join the army or form their own guerrilla units. New York alone furnished about 23,000 loyalist troops, perhaps as many as all the other colonies combined. The loyalist fighters aroused a vengeful hatred among the patriots (as the American Revolutionaries called themselves), and when taken in battle they were treated as traitors. George Washington detested them, saying as early as 1776 that “they were even higher and more insulting in their opposition than the regulars.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What does sacred Honor mean to you?
David DeGerolamo

When I first got the news in my RSS feed that Pelosi was going to move ahead with impeachment, I was honestly caught off guard. Given how badly the hearings went (despite the MSM parroting otherwise) and how some moderate Dems are jumping ship, I had assumed that they would have compromised with a vote on censure and been done with it. Despite what you and I think of her, Pelosi is an expert at maneuvering in the D.C. Swamp, which is evident given how long she has been at the top of the Democratic party in leadership roles. For her to move forward on such shaky ground is perplexing at best. I generally agree with my good friend JohnyMac and the scenarios that he lays out (if you can’t tell, I still think that scenario 2 is ultimately going to happen).
The other thing I was (and have been for a while) shocked at is how little thought they are giving about unintended consequences. Much like when the Democrats suspended the filibuster for all judicial appointments besides the Supreme Court gave McConnell the justification to remove it for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, they seem to not care about the possibility that the gross oversteps in power that they are making may come back to bite them again. This, however I can answer: they intend to never lose another election. Whether by eliminating the electoral college, unjust redistricting, importing thousands of foreigners and making them citizens, or wanting to lower the voting age, they intend to make sure that once they seize power back it is for keeps. And when that happens, they fully desire to rain holy hell on those of us who dare to stand in the way of “progress”.
We are moving towards an uncertain future. The brazen actions by the Deep State, the MSM, and the Democrats in Congress are truly astounding. I think that if the Dems manage to somehow seize all three branches in 2020, you can kiss the filibuster in the Senate goodbye. This will allow them to ram any and all legislation through that they want with no recourse from the GOP. If that occures, the reality is TINVOOWOOT – There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This.
My question to you is this: What are you doing today to make yourself better for tomorrow? I am sick of seeing all of these keyboard warriors on the internet saying “well I can take the gubmint on all day” as they sit their overweight body down on a flat bench with their overpriced Safe Queen AR in a sled on a static range and get off about how tight their groups are. That is not what we need now. We need serious men and women for serious times. We need people who are going to be hitting that PT hard, making the sacrifices needed to store that extra food, water and ammo, and taking the necessary training to make themselves more skilled and more deadly than before. We need people praying that the ship rights itself while preparing for the alternate if it does not.
We don’t need talkers. We need doers.
Tempus Fugit.
If Nancy Pelosi did love everyone, how does she condone the abortions that the government funded? How does she help her immediate constituents in San Francisco who are living in their own filth on the streets? Why does she support the term “hater” for anyone who supports the President’s policies?
The people know who is lying, who is abusing the Constitution and who is suffering from dementia. In the words of Greta Thunberg: How dare you continue your unbridled quest for power at any cost or of being a Christian?
David DeGerolamo