I hit upon something in the last post that’s been bugging me all night. These people, whether Soros DAs, or WEF robots or whatever, they are the insurrectionists. The reason this bothered me so much is that it’s obvious, but no one, except a few memes here and there, have made the same connection. There’s a lot of talk of treason and corruption, but I wonder, legally, what does it take to invoke charges of insurrection among the many public servants, across the board, not only, but especially House and Senate members, who have violated their oaths of office, who refuse to enforce any laws except those that put American citizens at risk of life and limb while protecting illegal alien invaders? How many of these foreign invaders are being paid out of the public treasury? And what are they being paid to do and when do they intend to do it?
Stay with me a minute here, I’m not talking about some clever internet meme or viral rant, I’m talking legally. The Supreme Court has never ruled, as far as I know, on a case of institutional insurrection against the general public, acting against the will, security and peace of the nation. The only ones powerful enough to commit such an act are those placed in positions of authority by either a vote, or a rigged election. Which do you think would be more likely to commit these egregious violations, the legally and properly elected or those who benefit from a rigged election?
I know the Loy Brunson case before the Supreme Court tries to tackle this directly and that will set a precedent, but the question we need to be asking the courts, as corrupt as they are, too, is what recourse do the people have legally for when the elected representatives act in ways that are harmful to the nation, especially, in this case, in favor of foreign interests?
The routine answer to that has always been the ballot box, but, as we have seen, the ballot box holds no magic shield against corruption and whether corruption is present or not, elected officials failing to defend the constitution and uphold and prosecute the laws of the land are in effect committing an act of insurrection, it’s in disregard of the oath that they took to defend those things that the legal case can be made, whether they got there through corruption or not, it’s a separate crime to administratively make null and void a properly drafted and constitutionally passed and signed law.
There is no provision other than insurrection and violation of the oath that can be cited, but if the people, generally, can be cited for insurrection without ever planning and/or attempting to execute that insurrection, so can the representatives and senators. They commit insurrection when they ignore their duties to defend the nation from alien invasion and hostile action. We have seen hostile action against the innocent with the full backing of DAs failure to faithfully prosecute these laws. All of the public health laws were violated by the states over the pandemic, but no one was cited, no one was prosecuted for breaking those laws. Why not? Because no one filed charges against them or those charges were not taken seriously by the Sheriff’s Department, but that should just add one more name to the list on the lawsuit, not discourage one from making the list.
