The Biden administration is calling for a “new biomedical research agency” which would operate under the guise of treatments for chronic diseases, but which would also merge national security with health security.

Story at-a-glance:

• President Biden is calling for a “new biomedical research agency” that would operate under the guise of treatments for chronic diseases, but which, if implemented, would merge national security with health security.
• The plan would suck up masses of private data from “Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo and Google Home” and other consumer electronic devices, as well as information from health care providers to determine if an individual might be likely to commit a crime.
• The plan also would work toward merging “biology, engineering and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security” along with “advancements in biotechnology, supercomputing, big data and artificial intelligence” to accomplish its goals.
• In the interests of national safety, the Department of Defense wants everyone to have biometric wearables that could monitor 165 different biomarkers using an algorithm that could “recognize an infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms.”
• Ultimately, promoters of the technology want to “develop tools to record, mark and manipulate precisely defined neurons in the living brain” that are determined to be linked to an “abnormal” function or a neurological disease.

A “new” proposal by the Biden administration to create a health-focused federal agency modeled after DARPA is not what it appears to be. Promoted as a way to “end cancer,” this resuscitated “health DARPA” conceals a dangerous agenda.

Read The Whole Article Here…

It’s actually like high blood pressure in your lungs because the blood can’t get through because so many of the vessels are blocked. And the terrifying thing of this is that people with Pulmonary Artery Hypertension usually die of right sided heart failure within three years.

More…

Cooper’s links were not working correctly so I fixed them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just got a call from my finance team with an update on our July fundraising numbers. To put it simply, with only five days left to meet our $8,000 online target, we’re behind schedule.

We’re committed to the fight to turn North Carolina blue, but we need your support immediately — we just can’t risk falling behind our fundraising goals. My team asked me to reach out to you directly to ask that you chip in $25 immediately to help us stay on track.

Your support is integral to our work. With your help, we’re giving a voice to North Carolina’s working and middle-class communities — not just the wealthy few. We’re taking the necessary steps to protect our environment for future generations. We’re working to expand Medicaid coverage to folks who need it most. And it’s all because you’re with us in the fight to make North Carolina a better place to live for everyone.

Stand with us right now by rushing a donation of $25, or whatever works for you, to help close our fundraising gap >>>

If you’ve saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:

Thanks,

Roy

I wrote an article yesterday to the Deep State operatives outlining a series of questions for them to consider. I did this for two reasons:

1. I wanted them to understand that their motives for treason are based on personal reasons. Their acts and participation in the coup may be based in a quest for power, money and/or fame. They may also be based in fear: fear of retribution for breaking the truth or fear of justice if this coup collapses. Their motives are not based on a better future for the country or their children. They have no sense of Judgment in the afterlife. They have no honor or public virtue. They only have attributes that history shows are doomed to failed.
2. I wanted to expose the trolls and their flawed logic that present false propositions to weaken our resolve.

Here is the first example:

from preparetodefendyourselves

although I certainly agree with the sentiment, the writer of this article is at least half clueless to the real history.
(((they))) engineered the French Revolution to their benefit.
the founding principals are a complete fraud perpetrated by (((them))). The founding fathers and the constitution was a complete scam from word one.
I can pick apart every point as to how he’s clueless to the history of the (((real perps))).
We don’t have a hope in hell of winning unless you face who the REAL enemy are.

Note how the first sentence attacks me for being “clueless to the real history”. I have seen this too many times for 13 years: I am right and you are wrong, clueless, stupid or another label to marginalize the person or argument without any facts. Since he is right, he continues to attack the founding principles, Constitution and the founding fathers. Although he can pick apart every point as to how I am clueless, no facts are presented. His closing sentence warns us that we have no hope to win unless we know who the real enemy is. As usual, the real enemy is not named so we must have no hope of winning.

My first point is that this comment is no different than pulling out the race card to win the “argument”. There are no facts presented to support his claims, no positive steps forward and no hope of success. According to him. We cannot organize and move forward without first being able to recognize those who want their own glory because they know better. This is the Strongman argument outlined in the The Road to Serfdom:

When other readers questions his comment, he doubles down:

from preparetodefendyourselves 

absolutely not sitting this one out. But I sure as hell know EXACTLY who the enemy are.
Do you ? Do you really ? I’d be willing to bet 95% on here do not.
And if you don’t get that point ….

and

from preparetodefendyourselves

Matt Bracken….. another fool who doesn’t know who the (((real enemy))) are.
Not only does he not know, you point it out and he attacks you for it.
How the hell do you win a war without knowing exactly who to go after ?

Which only confirms my original assessment. As for the comments stating that we must find a leader, I addressed this in another post.

I do not care if we have a leader, have no hope of winning at this time or the consequences of standing up. I have no choice but to follow in His path for me and only have a desire to hear “arise good and faithful servant” on Judgment Day. It is time to focus on the truth and not be distracted by traitors and wishful strongmen.

David DeGerolamo

This video was sent via the comments on one of my posts. A good history lesson and possibly the beginning of the cancer that has spread throughout the West.

David DeGerolamo

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• In a July 16, 2021, White House press briefing, press secretary Jen Psaki admitted the Biden administration is violating the First Amendment by alerting social media companies to posts and accounts it believes is peddling “misinformation” about COVID injections
• This kind of corporate-government collusion to censor free speech is illegal. As noted by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, “The government cannot accomplish through threats of adverse government action what the Constitution prohibits it from doing directly”
• The Biden Administration wants COVID “misinformants” to be removed from all social media platforms, not just one or two
• In that same press briefing, Psaki also referred to the COVID shots as “approved,” and having “gone through the gold standard of the FDA approval process.” This is verifiably false. All currently available COVID injections are authorized for emergency use only. None are approved and none have finalized their safety studies
• The Biden Administration’s call to censor — through public utilities and private companies — anyone who shares information about risks and the lack of benefit of these COVID injections must be rejected on ethical, legal and Constitutional grounds

In a July 16, 2021, White House press briefing,¹ press secretary Jen Psaki admitted the Biden Administration is violating the First Amendment by alerting social media companies to posts and accounts it believes is peddling “misinformation” about COVID injections. When asked by a reporter to expound on how this flagging works, Psaki said:

“Well, I would say first, it shouldn’t come as any surprise that we’re in regular touch with social media platforms — just like we’re in regular touch with all of you and your media outlets — about areas where we have concern, information that might be useful, information that may or may not be interesting to your viewers …

So we are regularly making sure social media platforms are aware of the latest narratives dangerous to public health that we and many other Americans seeing … And we work to engage with them to better understand the enforcement of social media platform policies.

So let me give you an example, just to illustrate it a little bit. The false narrative that remains active out there about COVID-19 vaccines causing infertility … which has been disproven time and time again.

This is troubling, but a persistent narrative that we and many have seen, and we want to know that the social media platforms are taking steps to address it. That is inaccurate, false information … And that is an example of the kind of information that we are flagging or raising …

So a couple of the steps that … could be constructive for the public health of the country are providing for Facebook or other platforms to measure and publicly share the impact of misinformation on their platform and the audience it’s reaching … with all of you to create robust enforcement strategies that bridge their properties and provide transparency about rules.

You shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others if you — for providing misinformation out there.”

Read the Whole Article Here…

My Article I published on Friday, The Time To Throw Down Draws Near. Sooner Or Later It Is Going To Affect Us All, generated a good bit of discussion. I’m hoping that people will actually stand and fight now, and I am going to be interested in how many people show up for the protest on Sunday, August 1^st.

But I would like to share with you a couple things that were sent to me and brought to my attention over the weekend. The first of which are a couple of quotes from our founding fathers:

“Duty to God, to ourselves, to Posterity, enforced by the cries of slaughtered innocents, have urged us to take up Arms in our Defense. Such a day as this was never before known, either to us or to our fathers.” Matthew Thornton: letter to the inhabitants of the Colony of New Hampshire – June 2, 1775

“There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free – if we mean to preserve inviolate these inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending – if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon, until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained – we must fight! – I repeat it sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts, is all that is left us!” Patrick Henry: speech to the Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775

I swear I have to be related to Patrick Henry somewhere down the line.

Perhaps the most important of the things brought to my attention this weekend was an excerpt from a self-defense book that one of my good friends has read:

The criteria that need to be met for people to turn to violence are well known:

1) Perceived justification – check – One more in a whole line of abuses, forced vaccination. It doesn’t matter if they’re by government or corporate at this point.

2) Lack of alternatives – check – in this case the alternative is to submit or potentially lose everything due to loss of income

3) Ability to carry out the violent acts – check – The gun is called an equalizer for a reason and the ubiquitous AR15 can both deliver a devastating amount of firepower in close quarters and accurately take out a target at 400 yards with a red dot sight.

The fourth, and final criteria, the one that I believe has been the one staying hands is:

4) Benefits outweigh the consequences. This ties into the lack of alternatives. When someone is going to lose everything they might decide to make someone else do the same.

So here we are at this moment in History. Everyone knows something is up, and evil it seems is making its play. Will You STAND?

Anyway I just wanted to share these few thoughts from the weekend with you.

Wes