There have been many scandals in this century. In our country, the majority are centered within and supported by the Democrat Party. Today, the line between parties has blurred as the rush to reset the world economy and seize control are in its final stages.
The major scandal is the coup of the American government which has been condoned by the federal government, big business and the media. But what if this is just another brick in the wall?
There is ample evidence that the SARS-COV2 virus was manufactured in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The information contained in the Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists Opens The Wuhan Virus Pandora’s Box documents this very well. I encourage everyone to read and comprehend the article. It is lengthy and most people will have to do some additional research to understand codons, mRNA translation, cleavage sites and CPISPR to fully grasp what has been done.
Main points:
1. China sealed the research records of the lab.
2. The NIH and NIAID (Dr. Fauci) illegally funded Shi’s gain-of-function research.
The responsibility of the NIAID and NIH is even more acute because for the first three years of the grant to EcoHealth Alliance, there was a moratorium on funding gain-of-function research. Why didn’t the two agencies therefore halt the federal funding, as apparently required to do so by law? Because someone wrote a loophole into the moratorium.
The moratorium specifically barred funding any gain-of-function research that increased the pathogenicity of the flu, MERS, or SARS viruses. But then a footnote on page 2 of the moratorium document states that “[a]n exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”
This seems to mean that either the director of the NIAID, Anthony Fauci, or the director of the NIH, Francis Collins, or maybe both, would have invoked the footnote in order to keep the money flowing to Shi’s gain-of-function research.
3. The Institute is rated for BSL4 but:
Much of Shi’s work on gain-of-function in coronaviruses was performed at the BSL2 safety level, as is stated in her publications and other documents. She has said in an interview with Science magazine that “[t]he coronavirus research in our laboratory is conducted in BSL-2 or BSL-3 laboratories.”
“It is clear that some or all of this work was being performed using a biosafety standard — biosafety level 2, the biosafety level of a standard US dentist’s office — that would pose an unacceptably high risk of infection of laboratory staff upon contact with a virus having the transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2,” Ebright says.
“It also is clear,” he adds, “that this work never should have been funded and never should have been performed.”
And the last point:
4. Kudos too to Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who told CNN on March 26, 2021 that the “most likely” cause of the epidemic was “from a laboratory,” because he doubted that a bat virus could become an extreme human pathogen overnight, without taking time to evolve, as seemed to be the case with SARS2.
Steven Quay, a physician-researcher, has applied statistical and bioinformatic tools to ingenious explorations of the virus’s origin, showing for instance how the hospitals receiving the early patients are clustered along the Wuhan №2 subway line which connects the Institute of Virology at one end with the international airport at the other, the perfect conveyor belt for distributing the virus from lab to globe.
Although the article details many reasons for hiding this tragedy, consider this:
Another reason, perhaps, is the migration of much of the media toward the left of the political spectrum. Because President Trump said the virus had escaped from a Wuhan lab, editors gave the idea little credence. They joined the virologists in regarding lab escape as a dismissible conspiracy theory. During the Trump administration, they had no trouble in rejecting the position of the intelligence services that lab escape could not be ruled out. But when Avril Haines, President Biden’s director of national intelligence, said the same thing, she too was largely ignored. This is not to argue that editors should have endorsed the lab escape scenario, merely that they should have explored the possibility fully and fairly.
We will never know the true extent of the death and damages caused by this US funded lab experiments. Congressional hearings have whitewashed the whole affair while presenting Dr. Fauci as our saviour instead of one of the people directly responsible.
So which scandal is worse: a worldwide pandemic funded by the US government or the overthrow of the government? Could the worst scandal be the sterilization of the world with a “novel” vaccine which is actually the means to deliver the “death blow”.
So the real question is when? When do we acknowledge the depth of the evil in this government and act? Silence in the face of evil is killing us. All of us except for the ones who are perpetuating evil.
David DeGerolamo
