NC Renegades

From Malachi in the comments:

David, with all due respect, I’m confused. If you were to discover a ‘red room’, how would you deal with that? We know that the authorities protect such places. So what would you do? I get the impression that A.C.W. would go in guns-a-blazin’ and terminate the vermin. How would you ‘stand up’ if not in that way?
‘Turn the other check, resist not the evil man, the meek will inherit the earth.’ Plenty of Scripture to encourage us to sit still and take it expecting some heavenly reward. Our pre-Christian ancestors would already have dealt with the evil, and yet we continue to complain and wait. What do you suggest we do? This is not an attack. I consider you a brother, but I’d seriously like an answer.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Definitions:

1. Vigilante

a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily (as when the processes of law are viewed as inadequate)

broadly : a self-appointed doer of justice

2. Renegade

an individual who rejects lawful or conventional behavior

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wonder if anyone ever thinks about the title of this site? I do not feel any obligation to anyone but the Lord. What does that mean? In relation to the question concerning red rooms, I will admit that I have not thought about it in the past since I only recently heard about these rooms. The only way that I would “discover” a red room would be if the Lord directed my footsteps. I do not go out much and do not associate with many people at this point. So let me be clear: I would act to terminate anyone hurting a child in any location.

That being said, I would act in or on a Committee of Safety. I had prepared a presentation for this part of our history a few years back but the agenda of the group meeting changed. I took that to be a sign from the Lord that it was not the right time. At present, I would not even attempt to define lawful or conventional behavior in this country. My personal thoughts on vigilante justice are based more on eternal salvation. We cannot be hindered by inaction or doubts but who wants to make a mistake that will impact our eternal salvation?

If I act to protect the innocent (especially children) or am directed by the Lord to act against evil, the choice is to act. If that is your definition of vigilante, we agree. In other circumstances, if a group decides that someone needs to be punished without a trial in which to defend themselves, then we disagree. Justice needs to be restored and swift justice will be needed.

Consider:

So to be clear, the Lord is responsible for vengeance. I believe that He uses righteous Men of God in some cases to fight and eliminate evil. I do not pretend to speak for the Lord or if He will avenge a nation who have turned their back on Him. As I said, I will defend the innocent from harm and have no problems for swift justice.

I know that many readers will object to this answer. I have a question for you: do you carry a firearm at all times? If the answer is no, then do some soul searching. I always carry a firearm and continue training myself and others in their use. I will say that the only recent change in my behaviour has been to carry an extra magazine. Times are spicy. Actions have consequences. Words are meaningless when the fight against evil becomes a physical reality.

I pray that I act using a firm reliance on Divine Providence so that my eternal soul is not jeopardized by rationalization instead of reasoned actions.

‘Turn the other check, resist not the evil man, the meek will inherit the earth.’

Matthew 5:

5“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. 6“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. 7“Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.8“Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.9“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

The meek will inherit the earth when God deems it so. Jesus told us next that those who hunger and thirst for righteousness will be satisfied. Be merciful and pure in heart. Be Men of God.

38“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

Concerning the above Bible verses from Matthew 5, I must confess that I will resist and terminate any evil man or woman caught doing evil to innocents. The Lord will direct my words, footsteps and actions. If anyone wants me to put man’s law or opinions first, I can only say “it ain’t gonna happen”.

David DeGerolamo

Since it is my vocation in life to say the things that everyone else is too terrified to say, here we go. Put out the cat. Especially if it’s black.

What this woman in the video above is describing is nothing less than the decades-long goal of dumbing ALL students down to the level of welfare-class blacks in order to achieve “equity” in the schools. Folks, I dropped out of high school largely because of this. Also the open rape threats by black guys while sitting four feet away from a teacher in study hall who had announced on the first day of school in August of ARSH 1992 that, “I’m retiring this year and I don’t give a shit about any of you. Do not talk to me. Do not bother me. Leave me alone, and I’ll leave you alone.” He wasn’t kidding. Even hearing a six foot tall black guy threaten to rape my fifteen year old person, less than 100 pounds soaking wet, didn’t phase that POS “teacher” in the slightest. I looked at the teacher after the black guy said, “Bitch, you uptight. You need a gud f***”, locked eyes with the teacher, he looked down at his magazine, I got up and walked to the school office and said, “Draw up the withdrawal papers. I’m done. I’m never coming here again.” Punchline? The lib boomer gifted teacher, having been summoned at the news that Ann Barnhardt – as in the-one-who-was-skipped-twice Ann Barnhardt – was demanding withdrawal, looked at me, called me a “princess” and asked, “Who in the hell do you think you are?” To my eternal shame, I did NOT say, “Who do I have to be?” I said, “Well, I know I’m better than this.” Derp. Such a lost rhetorical opportunity. Anyway, I digress.

More…

h/t WRSA

Ukrainian troops are surrendering in droves, Russian TASS news agency claims, to the extent that Moscow has set up a special radio frequency so Ukrainian soldiers wishing to survive the Meat Grinder can do so safely.

Approximately 10,000 Ukrainian soldiers have surrendered to the Russians using the special 149.200 “Volga” radio frequency, which has been operating since mid-summer, TASS reported.

“Now more than 10,000 Ukrainian servicemen have already chosen life and used the 149.200 ‘Volga’ frequency to surrender. The captives are being fed; they are being provided with all necessary medical care,” a source told TASS, saying the radio frequency works along the entire front.

More…

Click here if popup blocker is preventing you from pulling up the video.

Source

The above graphic is a variation from author G. Michael Hopf:

“Hard times create strong men,

strong men create good times,

good times create weak men,

and weak men create hard times.”

Memes can be altered to suit circumstances and influence actions. What is the truth for our time? Good times create evil men and women, and they will stop at nothing to kill and enslave us.

Some days I feel like I have led a sheltered life. Working long hours building a business for the government to rape does not leave much time for fun or outside personal relationships. I got a rude awakening on evil once Obama took office. I never had heard the expression “tea bagger” (along with multiple other sexual practices) before in my life . Watching our civilization devolve into chaos prior to going into the chasm is hard. Watching people accept this fate without any reliance on Divine Providence is harder.

Watching the latest report from LTC Murray yesterday “enlightened” me to another new term: red rooms. Just when I thought the leaders and puppet masters of Western governments could not sink any lower into the depths of depravity, I was shown again that I was wrong.

How do we rid ourselves of such evil? Laws are not the answer; they are the enablers of evil. There will be no justice in this country in any court of law. I do not believe in vigilante justice for the simple reason that I believe in God. That belief brings a great responsibility to act in a righteous manner and fight evil. Which brings me back to how to rid ourselves of such evil? I know that the fight starts and ends with our faith. The question should be how can we increase our faith and the faith of our people so that the Lord will once again shine His favor on His people to give us the strength to fight and defeat evil even at this large a scale.

David DeGerolamo

Scroll down all the way near the bottom of this article to read about UN SDG 16.2!
Sex with children. Actually, read this entire article about 30 times to learn what their plan is for all of us. I have posted this before and never got even one response.

SDG16 promises to eradicate many of the worst crimes in today’s world, including crimes committed against children. For instance, the aim of SDG16.2 is:

End abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children.
Yet, contrary to all evidence, ethics, common sense and criminal law, it seems that several important UN partners and “stakeholders” don’t consider paedophilia to be a form of child abuse.

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), which was instrumental in the formation of the ICC, is a non-governmental organisation (NGO) that has long been a close “partner” of the UN. The UN and the ICJ have collaborated on numerous joint projects, such as spreading SDG messaging among academic institutions.

The ICJ is an influential UN stakeholder. In 1993, the UN gave the ICJ its Human Rights award for the following reasons:

The International Commission of Jurists was established to uphold the rule of law and the legal protection of human rights throughout the world. It has actively contributed to the elaboration of international and regional standards and has helped to secure their adoption and implementation by governments. The Commission has closely collaborated with the United Nations and actively works at the regional level to strengthen human rights institutions.
The ICJ convened in 1952 as an overtly geopolitical organisation. Its stated purpose was to denounce “human rights abuses,” but only in the Soviet Union. It subsequently broadened its remit and started looking at abuses elsewhere.

In March of this year, The ICJ published its “8 March Principles.” Its alleged objective was “to offer a clear, accessible and workable legal framework — as well as practical legal guidance — on applying the criminal law to conduct.”

In “8 March Principles,” the ICJ advocates:

With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.
This language opens up the distinct possibility that predatory paedophiles, should they ever be charged, may be able to offer mitigation if they or their lawyers can convince their child targets to testify that they gave their consent.

As we know, coercion is a common paedophile practice. Many child protection organisations—the UK-based National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) among them—recognise that coercion is part of the grooming process:

Grooming is a process that involves the offender building a relationship with a child, and sometimes with their wider family, gaining their trust and a position of power over the child, in preparation for abuse.

I just read about more Lawfare being waged against Trump. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-rages-deranged-ny-judges-corporate-death-penalty-decision

Distraction? Likely. Still … In reading the comments, I found one from manofthenorth which was exceedingly well put. While I generally have difficulty agreeing with a Yankee, I can find nothing with which to argue with his comment.

“The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!

If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it.”

“What, then, is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense.

Each of us has a natural right — from God — to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two. For what are our faculties but the extension of our individuality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties? If every person has the right to defend even by force — his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of collective right — its reason for existing, its lawfulness — is based on individual right. And the common force that protects this collective right cannot logically have any other purpose or any other mission than that for which it acts as a substitute. Thus, since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force — for the same reason — cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups.

Such a perversion of force would be, in both cases, contrary to our premise. Force has been given to us to defend our own individual rights. Who will dare to say that force has been given to us to destroy the equal rights of our brothers? Since no individual acting separately can lawfully use force to destroy the rights of others, does it not logically follow that the same principle also applies to the common force that is nothing more than the organized combination of the individual forces?

If this is true, then nothing can be more evident than this: The law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all.”

“But, unfortunately, law by no means confines itself to its proper functions. And when it has exceeded its proper functions, it has not done so merely in some inconsequential and debatable matters. The law has gone further than this; it has acted in direct opposition to its own purpose. The law has been used to destroy its own objective: It has been applied to annihilating the justice that it was supposed to maintain; to limiting and destroying rights which its real purpose was to respect. The law has placed the collective force at the disposal of the unscrupulous who wish, without risk, to exploit the person, liberty, and property of others. It has converted plunder into a right, in order to protect plunder. And it has converted lawful defense into a crime, in order to punish lawful defense.”

h/t Zerohedge

From Publius Huldah:

1. Here is a fascinating 27 minute video from a former Venezuelan showing how a new (and Marxist) Constitution was foisted on The People of Venezuela.  Chavez got a convention called to “amend” Venezuela’s existing Constitution.   But instead of proposing Amendments to the existing Constitution, Chavez’ henchmen at the Convention imposed a new Marxist Constitution granting dictatorial powers to Chavez & disarming the Venezuelan People https://rumble.com/v3ketqp-con-con-the-venezuelan-angle.html 

Americans!  The globalists want to move the United States into the North American Union where a Parliament is to be set up over and above the United States, Canada and Mexico; and our police & military forces are to be combined.   To get this done, they need to get a new Constitution for our Country which transforms the United States from a sovereign nation to a member state of the North American Union.  Here is the Council on Foreign Relations’ (CFR) Task Force Report on the North American Union.

The Biden Administration is also pushing the North American Union – see this January 10, 2023 Declaration of North America signed by Biden, the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of Mexico.  It’s a summary of the CFR’s Task Force Report.

To get a new Constitution, they need Congress to call an Article V Convention.

Their hirelings, who pose as “Patriots”, claim we need a Convention to get Amendments to “limit the power & jurisdiction of the federal government”.  But our Constitution already limits the fed gov’t to a tiny handful of    enumerated powers – the problem is that everyone ignores the existing constitutional limits on federal power.  

2. Mark Meckler of the so-called “COS” organizations, says the new Speaker of the House [Klaus Schwab’s puppet Kevin McCarthy]  supports an Article V Convention.  Of course he’d support a Convention – how else to usher in The Great Reset!

3.  It appears that if Congress adds together all of the applications sent to Congress since 1789, they have enough States to call a Convention.4.  For years – and still today – convention pushers have falsely assured people that Congress “can’t” call a convention until Congress gets 34 applications asking for the same Amendment & that Delegates “can’t” do anything except consider Amendments requested by 34 State Legislatures.

Meanwhile, their puppets in Congress are filing legislation for Congress to count all applications together – regardless of the Amendment specified in the State’s application:

The legislation filed last year [HR 8419] provided that ALL non-rescinded applications would be counted together to get to 34 States.

The Legislation filed this year [HCR 24] provides that all applications on any “national issue” or for a BBA – whether since rescinded or not – are to be counted together. 

So it doesn’t matter what Amendment a State Legislature asks for!  The federal bills show that if Congress calls an Article V Convention, Congress is likely to count ALL applications together—including applications filed in 1789 for a Bill of Rights, during 1861 to avert the Civil War, during 1901 for popular election of US Senators, with all other applications requesting amendments on a variety of subjects to get to 34 States asking for a Convention.  

5. We are facing Great Evil. The convention pushers are serving the interests of the globalists, and are telling Americans a great many lies in order to get their support for an Article V Convention.

It is imperative that your State Legislature promptly rescind all of the applications they sent to Congress for an Article V convention.

Joanna Martin, J.D.

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

President Biden and his campaign are working on a critical project for his re-election bid: Make sure he doesn’t trip.

Driving the news: As voters express deep concerns about the 80-year-old president’s age and fitness for office, Biden’s team is taking extra steps to prevent him from stumbling in public — as he did in June, when he tripped over a sandbag at the Air Force Academy.

• With a physical therapist, Biden has been doing exercises to improve his balance as far back as November 2021.
• Since his stumble in June, he has been wearing tennis shoes more often to avoid slipping — and using the short stairs on Air Force One, entering the plane on a lower deck than before.

More…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Don’t worry about the issues, wars or economic collapse. Just make sure Biden can walk without falling over. And for his next trick, they will see if he can walk and talk at the same time (but they are not holding out much hope).

Elections have consequences. Stolen elections have more consequences.

David DeGerolamo